Archive for November, 2007

Helping the Adult Ignorant May Not Be Possible

It is only on very rare occasions that it is possible to help an ignorant person see the truth.  In fact, I say ‘very rare’, but in my whole life up to now I have never managed to do this myself, but I take it on faith that it might be possible :-) .  Fact is that woo-woo beliefs and views of the world are ingrained into people, and when adulthood comes, obviously those ideas are too much ingrained to be reversable.

The most efficient and productive way to go about helping people would be to start teaching a skeptical and scientific outlook to the universe to children.  That would ensure a much higher percentage of future responsible, well-balanced adults, and therefore a better world for mankind.

Religious groups have been doing the same since… well, ever, and are still doing this today: they teach their children to become gullible closed-minded unscientific and religious adults.  If governments (and the few enlightened parents) start teaching children in the right way, that would benefit us all.

sleone_gun.jpg

Leave a Comment

Results

Well, I have results (see the previous post – An Experiment).  Up till now I had only one reply.  People just don’t answer my questions.  No matter if it is ‘deep’ questions, or simple questions.  They just don’t answer either way.  It seems that I am just simply boring.

Leave a Comment

An Experiment

I have a facebook account.  Using this account, I often ask some of the big questions about life, the universe, and everything.  I very seldom get a reply.  When I do get a reply, it is one-liners.  For example, if I ask a deeply philosophical question about god, I get answers like “God exists.”

 So this is a little experiment to see if 1) people just don’t want to answer my questions, whatever they may be, or 2) people are not interrested in really asking, and finding answers to, the big questions.

I am about to post a new question on facebook.  It will be the all-important question: “Does marriage have any significant benefits?”  Of course, even that might be too philosophical.  I might have to ask an even simpler-minded question.  But let’s wait and see.

Comments (5)

Christian Racism

Today a very religious christian work colleague of mine told me that some of his fellow christians are of the opinion that black people (or for that matter, I assume all non-Caucasian people) are not ‘children of God’!  Can you believe that?  Let me rephrase – CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?

Leave a Comment

Communicating Ideas

I am writing a book that I hope to be published.  The title I currently have in mind is:

Asking the BIG Questions

Questions and Answers about Knowledge, Science, Philosophy, Faith, God, Punishment, and things like that

 

 Sounds cool?  You bet it’s going to be cool.  Just the foreword is a page-turner :-)   Let’s see if I get this done.

Leave a Comment

Curry’s Paradox – What Paradox?

A natural language version of Curry’s paradox might be the following sentence:

If this sentence is true, then Santa Claus exists.

We need not believe, beforehand, that the sentence is true or that Santa Claus exists. But we can ask, hypothetically, if the sentence is true, then does Santa Claus exist?

If the sentence is true, then what it says is true, namely that if the sentence is true, then Santa Claus exists. Therefore the answer to the hypothetical question must be yes: Santa Claus does exist if the sentence is true. However, that is exactly what the sentence states: not that Santa Claus exists, but that he exists if the sentence is true, which is just the hypothetical answer just established. Therefore the sentence is true after all, and since we have established that Santa Claus exists if the sentence is true, and that it is true, it follows that Santa Claus must exist.

Since it is evident that any claim could be “proven” in this manner, there is a paradox.

—————–

According to Wikipedia, this is an unresolved paradox, since there are no consent among thinkers as to its resolution.  Am I mistaken, or does it not logically follow from “However, that is exactly what the sentence states: not that Santa Claus exists, but that he exists if the sentence is true, which is just the hypothetical answer just established.” to “Therefore the sentence is true after all”?  Nowhere were there established that the sentence is true!  It was just established that, if the sentence is true, then the sentence is true.

Leave a Comment